Complying with the Crowdfund Act Won’t Be Trivial.

As part of the JOBS Act of 2012, Congress passed the Capital Raising Online While Deterring Fraud and Unethical Non-Disclosure Act (or “Crowdfund Act”).  But it won’t be available until the SEC promulgates rules making the provisions operational and clarifying what some of the legislative language means in practice.  Here is what we know to date about how crowdfunding will work for issuers (it also has requirements for the so-called “funding portals”, which we won’t discuss today):

Issuer Volume Limitation.  The total amount of securities an issuer may sell to all investors during the 12-month period immediately preceding the crowfunding transaction, including those securities sold in the crowdfunding transaction, may not exceed $1 million.

Investor Volume Limitation.  The total amount of securities an issuer may sell to any individual investor purchasing securities in a crowdfunding transaction in any 12-month period, including both the crowdfunding transaction and all other transactions during the period is:

  • The greater of $2,000 or 5% of annual income or net worth, if the annual income or net worth of the investor is less than $100,000; or
  • 10% of annual income or net worth, up to a maximum of $100,000, if the annual income or net worth of the investor is greater than $100,000.

Required Funding Portals.  Crowdfunding transactions must be conducted through a broker or a “funding portal” that has registered with the SEC.  The portals will have significant responsibility for preventing issuer fraud and for protecting investors.  These responsibilities include educating and screening potential investors, taking appropriate action to reduce the risk of fraudulent transactions (including checking the background of the issuer and its insiders), providing disclosure to the SEC, ensuring that the issuer does not receive any funding until the target offering amount has been raised, and taking steps to ensure that investors do not purchase more than their annual limit of securities of the issuer.

Advertising.  Issuers may only use advertisements that direct potential investors to the broker or funding portal. In effect, issuers in crowdfunding transactions will have much greater latitude to sell securities to strangers than they do in traditional private placements, which prohibit “general solicitation” of investors. Of course, the JOBS Act also called for the SEC to introduce a rule to eliminate the ban on advertising and general solicitation in Regulation D — Rule 506 transactions where all investors are accredited. This is by far the most exciting feature of the JOBS Act in the area of private placements.  But it also has the potential for rampant fraud.

Target Offering Size.  Issuers must disclose the amount of money they intend to raise.  Investors will be able to rescind their commitments if the issuer does not reach this target.

Exchange Act Relief.  The Crowdfund Act provides that the investors who join the issuer pursuant to the exemption will not count toward the reporting company shareholder threshold. In the absence of this relief, crowdfunded companies could easily end up with so many shareholders (now 2,000 accredited investors or 500 non-accredited investors) that they would be subject to public company reporting requirements.

Blue Sky Relief.   Securities sold in crowdfunding transactions will be exempt from the substantive registration and qualification requirements of state securities or “blue sky” laws, just as Rule 506 securities are now.

Restrictions on Transfer.  Like other privately placed securities, securities sold in crowdfunding transactions will not be immediately freely transferrable.  Subject to limited exceptions, crowdfunding securities must generally be held for one year before they can be transferred without restriction.

Issuer Disclosure Requirements.  Unlike under Rule 506, the Crowdfund Act does require issuers provide substantial disclosure to potential investors and ongoing financial disclosure on at least an annual basis.  The information that must be disclosed includes:

  • the issuer’s directors, officers, and each person holding more than 20% of its shares;
  • the issuer’s business plan;
  • financial information, depending on the size of the offering:
    • offerings under $100,000 – income tax returns and financial statements certified by the issuer’s principal executive officer;
    • offerings over $100,000 but under $500,000 – financial statements reviewed by an independent public accountant; and
    • offerings over $500,000 – audited financial statements;
  • use of proceeds and target offering amount; and
  • information about the offered securities and the issuer’s other securities, including  disclosure about the rights of crowdfunding investors relative to the issuer’s other investors.

As you will have gathered by now, crowdfunding transactions will require both the advice of lawyers and accountants.  But the start-up community had hoped for a way of raising money that would avoid complex legal and financial compliance and regulation.  Well they did not get what they wanted, and chances are that once the SEC rules are promulgated, the process will be even more arcane and less straight-forward.

I invite your comments to this blog post and look forward to posting another missive in the near future.

John A. Myer is a corporate and securities lawyer with Myer Law PLLC in Seattle, Washington.   This posting does not constitute legal advice.

Share
This entry was posted in General, Private Equity Placements. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • http://wac6.com/ William Carleton

    John, here’s an irony for you: with the lifting of the ban on general solicitation and the McHenry floor amendment to Title II that establishes a safe harbor for platform activity, a purer form of crowdfunding will more likely occur under Rule 506 of Reg D – except that only accredited investors will be able to purchase the securities!

    To prognosticate further: once platforms catering to angel-only deals show how crowdfunding can be done, those who would democratize the financing of entrepreneurs will press to let qualified or certified “sophisticated” (if not accredited) folks participate in those deals, too. At which point, the angel community may say, what is the trade off (in terms of greater regulation).

    • Joe Wallin

      Crowdfunding for accrediteds will actually work.

      • http://wac6.com/ William Carleton

        Totally agree, Joe.

        ________________________________

      • http://www.myercorplaw.com/index.html John A. Myer

         I agree, Joe.  But with accrediteds only 506 is the way to go.  No portals and no prescribed reporting requirements.  Just a good slide deck prepared by the issuer and thorough risk factors prepared by the lawyer. And we should get the advertising ban lifted by July 4 (good luck with that timing) long before the rules on 4(6) come down.

    • http://www.myercorplaw.com/index.html John A. Myer

       Bill, as usual, you are three steps ahead of me.  Of course, once all the 4(6) portals, the 506 AI only start-ups and the boiler rooms get cranking, the ubiquitous cacophony will overwhelm the SEC and the states, being pre-empted, will be left to sort though the wreckage.

  • http://twitter.com/cliffrudolph Cliff Rudolph

    John, thanks for the great summary.  We are also keeping an eye on this and it’s impact on D&O insurers.  Add insurance broker to the list of lawyers and accounts.

  • CLeyerle

    The JOBS Act does nothing that really helps seed and early stage entrepreneurs. Raising money becomes even more complicated and Congress will over-react in a few years once widespread fraud becomes too obvious to ignore.

    In crowdfunding, there is no safe harbor to rely on the representations of investors, and the required use of a portal means increased expense to the entrepreneur and another bonanza for Wall Street and its shadier ilk.

    The whole thing should have been called the Easy IPO On-Ramp bill, because that’s what it is really about.

    John, what are your thoughts on the integration of subsequent offerings? Does this change anything, or just make it all more opaque and treacherous?

    • http://www.myercorplaw.com/index.html John A. Myer

      Chris, one of the rules we are waiting for will cover whether the integration discussion found in Rule 502 will be expanded from Section 4(2) private placements to include Section 4(6) crowdfunding transactions.  I’ve been getting this question a lot today, by the way.

  • Zlata Berman

    Mr. Myer, in your professional opinion do you think other than the income of the investors, will there be any other pre-qualifying factors that would need to be taken into consideration to allow the investor to participate in crowdfunding? Things like background checks, credit reports, criminal history etc..

    • http://www.myercorplaw.com/ John A. Myer

       I prefer not to speculate over the content of rules yet to be drafted by the SEC.  In general, though, the issues you have raised tend to apply to company executives and not to investors.  Also, while income and net worth will affect how much an investor may invest, the idea of crowdfunding is not to exclude people who can afford to invest only a small amount.